Circimsized or Uncircimsized?!
Question: what is better?
Answers: what is better?
Uncut, its natural
Uncircumsized
Circimsized feels better i think then uncircimsized
Circimsized is best,,,cleaner
Not-circumcized is best BY FAR
It is natural. Most men are not circumcized on the world. 80% are not circumcized.
A circumcized penis has less feeling in it because it doesnt have the foreskin there to protect it and keep it soft and moist
It depends on who you ask i think Uncirced is better becuse i do not know any other way to be
curtdude
uncut and happy
Circumcised, every time.
My g/f prefers uncircumsized.
It depends where you come from. In the US, girls are partial to circumsized because most guys are. In Europe, the UK, Australia, the Far East, and South America, girls are probably partial to uncircumsized because 85% of men are uncut.
Foreskin is fun to play with, and its never caused me any cleanliness problems.
i wish i knew but im circumsized but uncircumzised looks cool to me. i sorta wish i had skin for a day just to see how it feels. it just seems it would feel better to slide the skin whn masturbating and just playin with the skin different ways
Uncircumcised. I am uncircumcised and i think it feels great. i live in US too.
Uncircumcised!
It just looks much better, its got more to play with and it looks more natural, as well as feels more natural.
Its also really good to play with.
The uncircumcised penis is also more sensitive, so you get better sex.
Hygene wise, if you wash yourself everyday, its 100% clean.
I am cut and glad
Intact (uncircumcised), I hate being circumcised. The foreskin is not extra skin but an integral part of the penis; measuring 15 square inches in an adult and accounting for over half the penile skin, lots of specialised nerve endings and the most sensitive parts of the penis.
Not one medical organisation in the world recommends routine infant circumcision anymore because the risks outweigh all the so-called benefits.
The claimed benefits of circumcision are a beat up (based on flawed studies) and don't really exist but medical authorities have worked out that the overall complication rate is higher than all the benefits claimed by the pro-cutting advocates. One by one the claims are disproved but the pro-cutting zealots come up with more and keep quoting the old ones despite the evidence against them. For example you have more chance of dying from a circumcision or losing your penis from infection than from penile cancer. The rate of penile cancer is higher in the largely-circumcised USA than in European countries where less than 1% of the male population is circumcised. Plus circumcised men have been found to have penile cancer, mostly on the scar. (Remember this is a very rare disease in intact or circumcised men).
A very recent study in New Zealand followed a cohort of boys through life from birth to age 32. About 40% were circumcised. The intact males had a slightly lower rate of sexually transmitted infections than the circumcised but there was no significant difference.
Using surgery to mutilate the genitals instead of washing in a modern western society makes no sense. Normal intact male genitals are, if anything, easier to wash than female ones and the same substance, smegma collects in the genital folds of both sexes. A few intact males have problems with tight foreskin but this is only a tiny proportion of intact males. The condition can now be almost always treated with simple stretching exercises, sometimes in combination with a steroid cream that speeds up the process.
I wish I'd been given the choice to choose for myself. Intact men can choose to get cut at any time in their life, though most have no desire to do so. The internet has shown that many men resent being circumcised. It's just not something that most of us talk about a lot, even to our parents.
Uncut. and loving it. If there would ever come a time when i decided to get 'er cut, it would be my choice, not someone elses. But I don't think that'll ever happen.